Archive:


Frustration

Did you ever have one of those days when you felt like you could just take the world by the scruff of the neck and SWING, and you just KNEW you’d throw it farther and faster than anyone ever had before, but you weren’t allowed to do it? Man. I HATE that feeling. I feel like a ball of energy, like a catapult pulled all the way back, ready to LET FLY with a giant boulder that would SMASH the hell out of something way off in the distance.

Robert X. Cringely once wrote that really creative people do something really unusual — they do things that are so creative that they literally blow away an entire field of work like cobwebs in the corner. The old ways just aren’t competitive anymore. In Cringely’s words, they “turn creativity into a destructive act.”

That’s how I feel right now. I want to DESTROY something. I want to do something so insanely amazing that it makes the earth shake and the heavens quake. I want to deal lightning from my fingertips. I want to drive down a two lane road at ninety miles an hour and flip some bucktoothed donut-eating cop the bird.

But then I come back to earth, where clients aren’t paying for Insanely Amazing solutions (at least not anymore) and bucktoothed cops sock you with fat speeding tickets whether or not you flip them off. And I’m left to wonder, where is the Autobahn of the soul? Where can we put the top down and push the pedal to the floor and wring out every ounce of potential from ourselves? What makes us the best we can possibly be?

Who knows, I’m no philosopher. All I know is, I ain’t finding it today. (sigh)


That Voice!

In the pantheon of Great Voices, before James Earl Jones, before Barry White, before them all was the first Great Voice of the Airwaves: Orson Welles. Welles had a voice that was made for radio: rich, velvety, simultaneously seductive and commanding. It’s no wonder that he was able to convince a nation of rational men and women that the Martians were landing!

Amazingly, someone is providing a means by which we can reconnect with the Great Voice once again. The Mercury Theatre on the Air is a Web site dedicated to preserving Welles’ radio plays. They even stream them out over the Web in RealAudio and MP3 format (including the infamous War of the Worlds broadcast). If you’re unfamiliar with Welles’ work, you owe it to yourself to check this out and let the Great Voice work its magic on you.


Mozilla Slims Down

If you’re a Windows user who’s been intrigued by Mozilla’s power and standards-compliance, but you’ve been turned off by its “bloat” (providing a browser, mail client, newsreader, HTML authoring program, etc. in one app), now you’ve finally got an alternative! Phoenix 0.1 has just been released. Phoenix strips out all the ancillary functionality to provide a slim, trim browser based on the world-beating Gecko rendering engine, and with a few neat new features (customizable toolbars!) to boot. A lot of the things I love about Mozilla haven’t made it into Phoenix yet — it is at version 0.1, after all — but it’s a neat example of how customizable and configurable Mozilla can be.


Ouch!!!

Wow…

one link from Scripting News to my Tara Sue Grubb story, and we get Slashdotted something fierce! Took down all our Web sites. Boy, the sysadmin is gonna LOVE me for this 🙂


On the Road Again…

Just found out my company is sending me to next week’s Open Source Content Management Conference (OSCOM) in Berkeley. This should be interesting! I’ll be blogging from the conference, so all my avid readers (both of ya 😉 ) will be able to see what’s new in the world of content management. So pack yer bags, Just Well Mixed is hitting the road!


New Stuff from Me at OCR

My new article on the tussle for Howard Coble’s House seat in North Carolina, entitled Tara Sue Takes Aim, has just been published by my usual outlet, the Online Community Report. If you’re at all interested in stories about (a) politics or (b) plucky underdogs, you should give it a read — I’m pretty proud of it.


Another Great Idea That Unfortunately Will Never Happen

Man.

Oh, MAN!

You have no idea how much I want this!!!

What a great idea. What a KILLER idea. If there is ever a contest for “best computer game ever”, Wasteland would have to be in the top ten. It’s the only RPG I ever was compelled to play to the finish not once, but twice.

And reading the article above makes me want to play it again! Better start hunting down a 5.25″ disk drive…


Bad Marketing… or REALLY Bad Marketing?

Now this is just wrong.


Idiocy in Action

You know, whenever I get to thinking that the depths of human stupidity have been plumbed, someone always comes along to demonstrate just how much further we can go. This guy is a prime example.

His big complaint seems to be that Google’s page-ranking algorithm, PageRank (clever naming there), isn’t “democratic” enough. He says this because Google ranks pages based (in part) on how many other sites link to those pages, and sites that themselves have a high PageRank have their links weighted disproportionately high when counting other sites’ PageRank. In other words, if I have a popular site, and I link to you, you show up higher in Google.

I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the political implications of technology, and the only thing I can figure about this guy is that he’s completely off his nut. There are some things we don’t want to be democratic! Any scheme for ranking sites is going to involve some selectivity. Indeed, that was the original brilliance of Google — they harnessed selectivity by figuring out that having lots of links to your site was probably a good way to indicate that people thought your site was good. From that, it’s not an unreasonable step to then say that, if I have a site that people have endorsed with many links, that I’m likely to know other good sites, and link to them.

Beyond the theoretical, too, there’s one thing I would say to anyone who complains about Google’s algorithm: Google works! It’s head and shoulders above any other search engine ever invented in accuracy. I nearly always find what I’m looking for on the first page of my results from Google. That’s what a search engine is supposed to do! So our grouchy author wants us to ditch a search engine that does its job excellently, because he’s got some philosophical issue with how it does it.

Like I said before, there’s always a new low. Congratulations, Daniel Brandt, you’ve just found it.


The Case Against War

Recently, a friend sent me an e-mail that made the case that anyone who was leery of launching a war against Iraq was motivated by ignorance, self-interest, or both. I know that now, with the war drums beating in the background, is probably not the ideal time to try and make the case for restraint. But the tone of the message made me feel that I had to try, in whatever limited way I could.

The result is this message. Read it and take it for what it’s worth — the opinion of one man, a man who is certainly no granola-crunchie peacenik, but who has reservations about the way we have chosen to deploy our awe-inspiring power in the world.

(more…)


9/11

You don’t need me to tell you that today is the first anniversary of the terrible attack upon the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Unless you live in a cave, the memory of that day is probably etched indelibly in your mind; and you’ve probably been casting a wary eye at the calendar ever since you flipped it to September.

It’s appropriate, therefore, to take a moment to say a prayer for the souls of all those who were lost one year ago; and to give thanks for the way events have unfolded since that day.

If you’d asked me on September 12 of last year whether we’d make it a full year without another terrorist attack, I would have laughed out loud. Of COURSE they would strike again! And yet, they have not. We struck them hard in their home base, routed the puppet government that propped them up, and sent them reeling into the mountains, dispersed and defeated. That’s not to say that the threat is gone; there are almost certainly al Qaeda cells lying dormant around the world. But we seem to have bought some time.

We have also planted the green shoots of freedom in Afghanistan. Whether they’ll be able to nurture them to maturity is another story; Afghanistan has been at war with itself for as long as anyone can remember. But there is hope, and hope is a rare commodity in that corner of the world.

So, where do we go from here? That’s the debate we as a nation will shortly be taking up. It will almost certainly be a passionate and contentious debate. But it’s one we must have, for in doing so — in taking up, as free men and women, the momentous questions of war and peace — we reaffirm the values that are our proudest accomplishment and our historic legacy to the world. We demonstrate that openness and transparency are not weaknesses, but strengths; that our ability to hold our own opinions, and express them, free of fear, remains intact. In short, we demonstrate that civil society has not been overturned — and that, all by itself, is a sort of victory, and perhaps the most appropriate monument we can devise to honor the sacrifices of all those who lost their lives one year ago.


Bad Moon Rising

Well, the anniversary of the Sep. 11 attacks is drawing near, and there’s bad mojo coming out of Afghanistan once again. I’m not a defeatist — I think our incursion into Afghanistan threw al-Qaeda’s plans into disarray, which has to be counted a success — but recent events have me wondering if maybe we’re not about to see another big move by bin Laden’s side.

By “recent events”, I’m referring to today’s botched assassination attempt on Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the car bomb attack on the Ministry of Information and Culture in Kabul, which killed 26 people and wounded over 100.

I have a sinking feeling that we’re seeing a replay of events from last year — events which presaged Sep. 11. And if we are, it raises the troubling prospect of al-Qaeda seeking to mark the anniversary with a bang.

(more…)


From the Department of Bad P.R. …

You know, you would think being married to a politician would teach you not to shoot your mouth off on the phone. But you’d be wrong…

Netanyahu’s Wife: Israel ‘Can Burn’


Mozilla 1.1 Out

The world’s best browser just got better — Mozilla 1.1 was released to the public this morning. Improvements over the already-terrific 1.0 revision include better standards compliance, improved performance and stability, new window icons, a greatly improved JavaScript Debugger, and much more. Check it out!


In A World…

The trailer for Jerry Seinfeld’s new movie, Comedian, is out, and it’s easily the funniest trailer I’ve seen in a LONG time. It’s Monday, you need a laugh — check it out.


History in the Making

Tara Sue Grubb, Libertarian candidate for Congress in North Carolina’s 6th District, is the first Congressional candidate ever to have a Weblog. What’s more, her first post is pretty damned winning. Excerpt:

What about a twenty-six year old female running against an aged, eighteen year career politician? We are polar opposites in many ways. Despite the odds, whatever they be, I am as serious as a heart attack. You don’t have to be a senior politician to understand the concepts of liberty, laissez-faire and justice. You don’t have to be a mastermind to see the people of this nation have been pushed into estrangement. Finally, you don’t have to be a suit to change the way things are.

Damn straight! That’s the kind of rhetoric I like to hear.

What’s more, she’s running against Howard Coble, the crusty old co-sponsor of the odious Berman-Coble hacking bill that allows copyright holders (read: movie studios, music publishers, etc.) to hack into your PC if they even suspect you of holding unauthorized copyrighted content, free of liability. If Tara Sue Grubb can put this clueless old codger to bed, I say more power to her.

So where do I send my check??? 🙂


Passages: Tran Do

For most Americans, the word “Vietnam” is just shorthand for an ugly war that we managed to botch. Which is a shame, because the Vietnamese have a long and fascinating history, in which America’s involvement plays only a minor part. They categorize their war against the American Army as just one part of their decades-long struggle for independence from foreign rule. Considering how our own nation was born by tossing off the shackles of colonialism, the fact that we did not support the Vietnamese in their fight to do the same thing — that we actively fought to prevent that — is pretty shameful.

But once the Vietnamese had won their liberation, they had to do something with it. And being ruled by a Communist oligarchy didn’t make that easy. That was the conclusion that one Vietnamese, Tran Do, came to in 1997, when he wrote a daring open letter in which he predicted that Vietnam must democratize or slide into chaos.

Now, just the fact that anyone would have the guts to write and distribute something like that was striking enough. What made Tran Do’s gesture even more powerful, though, was his credentials; he was General Tran Do, a hero of the wars against the French and Americans who had fought beside Ho Chi Minh and Vo Nguyen Giap in the earliest days of their struggle. And after the wars were over, he served in government for many years. Nobody could doubt Tran Do’s commitment to a vital, thriving Vietnam — a commitment that he felt was being endangered by the shortsightedness of the Communist bureaucrats who ran the nation.

When his letter resulted only in public condemnation from the government, Tran Do could have stood down. But he continued to write and speak in support of democracy for the Vietnamese people. And he never fled the country to preach his revolution from the safety of a plush Western office building, either. He essentially dared the government to come after him, to drag him off into the night like the other political prisoners the regime has taken. They never did, though they eventually expelled him from the Vietnamese Communist Party in frustration.

On August 9th, Tran Do died of natural causes at age 78. He left behind a legacy of brave soldiering, able governance, and devotion to his people. It is too early to tell if his last campaign, to save the spirit of the revolution he helped launch, will be judged a success. But for the sake of the people of Vietnam, who have suffered so greatly over the last sixty years, let’s hope that in the end history adds this one to his long list of victories.


Time Again to “Get Your War On”

In case you missed it, a thirteenth episode in the scathingly funny Web comic get your war on has been posted — so get clickin’!


Day of Defeat 3.1 Out

The World War II attack is back, in full force, with the release of Day of Defeat version 3.1. The whole 3.x series adds some new features, like “paratroop battles” (in which players get one life each, as in Counter-Strike, instead of the traditional Day of Defeat “infinite spawning” reinforcements), and tweaks some elements of play to make game balance more even. If you enjoy first-person shooters, you owe it to yourself to hop on the DoD bandwagon today!


Uncertainty and the Bomb

I’ve just finished reading Michael Frayn’s outstanding play Copenhagen, and I can’t recommend it highly enough. It’s the story of two men, Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg — both eminent physicists whose work formed the basis for our modern understanding of atomic physics — and a meeting they had in 1941, after their collaboration had been torn asunder when World War II put their countries on opposite sides (Heisenberg was a proud German, Bohr a half-Jewish Dane). They never revealed what went on at that meeting.

Why should we care? Because Heisenberg had just been made the head of the Nazi program to develop an atomic bomb. That program ultimately failed. But why Heisenberg would choose that moment to meet with his old mentor, a sworn enemy of the Nazi regime, has interested historians and scientists alike ever since. Was he trying to enlist his help in the German atomic program? Or was he trying to warn the Allies — he knew Bohr had contacts in the Danish Resistance — of its existence?

We’ll never know for certain. But Frayn takes us inside that meeting, looking at it from every angle, until we know the two men — and the terrible dilemmas they faced that day.

(more…)


Welcome to Blogworld, InfoWorld!

Count up one more mainstream media outlet that sees the value of blogging as a communications channel — InfoWorld columnist Jon Udell has launched the first of what are promised to be many InfoWorld blogs.

Put this next to Salon’s entry into the field and blogging starts looking more respectable all the time!


The Nightmare Scenario

If you’ve been reading The Washington Post lately, it’s hard to miss the emerging outlines of what could be thought of as the economic Nightmare Scenario — the worst-case scenario in which the tentative recovery we’ve been slogging through over the last year is strangled by a plunging Dow and collapsing consumer confidence.

It’s not a pretty thing to think about, but look at these two stories and I challenge you not to:

The executive summary: the slumping U.S. stock market is dragging down markets all over the world. And President Bush doesn’t have the first clue what to do about it. (Apparently the best proposal his brain trust could come up with came from economic advisor Larry Lindsay, who argued for a narrow cut in the capital gains tax rate, to encourage investors to buy new stock — an idea sensibly shot down by Bush’s political advisors, who pointed out that it would seem like another giveaway to the rich.)

Can anyone read this stuff and not think of poor Herbert Hoover in 1929, playing King Canute in the face of the rising tide of business disasters? Hoover’s biggest failing wasn’t as an administrator — he ably demonstrated his skills in that field by feeding Europe after World War I as the head of the Allied relief effort. His failure was instead a failure of imagination — he simply could not comprehend a world where markets failed to correct themselves. Hopefully Bush & Co. can muster up a bit more creativity than poor old Hoover. The early signs, however, are not encouraging.


Protect Your Neighbors! Report Them!

For those of you under the impression that we still live in a free society, a quick look at this page ought to bring you back to reality:

Operation TIPS – Terrorist Information and Prevention System

What is Operation TIPS? It’s a new program from those Friends of Freedom (TM) at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The idea is simple: you, Concerned Citizen that you are, join the Citizen Corps, a new government “volunteer” group, and then if you see anyone doing anything you consider suspicious, you call Uncle Sam and report ’em.

Does anyone else find this as disturbing as I do? A nation of Peeping Toms is by definition not a free nation. And who is to say what’s “suspicious behavior”? The government? Oh, please. If you will recall, we tried this once before, and it nearly led to civil war as a paranoid Administration started throwing anyone in jail who had the temerity to disagree with its policies.

The only difference is, back then Americans had the good sense to go to the wall to stop that kind of tyrannical behavior on the part of the government. Do we have anyone today who is willing to do the same?


No Mystery about “Enigma”

OK, this entry is a little behind schedule — I’ve been buried under work the last week, which has kept me from posting — but I definitely want to share this with you all.

Over the 4th of July weekend, I saw a great movie. It’s currently playing in art houses only, which is a shame, as it was more compelling and provocative than most of the so-called “thrillers” Hollywood shoves at us. It’s called Enigma, and if you’re a fan of well-acted, intelligent drama, it’s worth taking the trouble to find somewhere near you that’s showing it.

(more…)


Thoughts on the Fourth

Two hundred and twenty-six years ago today, a group of men from all over the British colonies in North America took a terrific risk. They gathered in Philadelphia to put their names to a document which was to be sent to the most powerful man in the world — King George III, on his throne in distant London. In that document, they politely but firmly announced the birth of a new type of human being — the American citizen — and in the process, they told that powerful man where he could put his divine right of kings.

When the bells rang in Philadelphia that day, a story began that is still unfolding. It is the story of the word “freedom”, and how it came to evolve from a privilege held by a lucky few to the birthright of all who came into the world on the soil of this new land. Sometimes the story is drama — Abraham Lincoln consecrating the battlefield at Gettysburg, Franklin Roosevelt telling his people that they had nothing to fear except fear itself. Sometimes it is tragedy — thousands of sailors perishing in the hulks of Pearl Harbor’s Pacific Fleet, millions of citizens crashing into poverty in the Great Depression. And sometimes, it is even farce — one need look no further than the Presidential elections of 1876 and 2000 for examples.

And yet, for 226 years, the story has gone on. There have been moments when it appeared that the last chapter had been written. George Washington must have thought so as he and his ragged army shivered at Valley Forge. The thought must have crossed the mind of Lincoln as he read the terrible casualty rolls from lost battles at Manassas, Fredericksburg, and Chancellorsville. Surely Roosevelt took pause as he watched the frantic retreat of the reeling American forces hit by the awesome Japanese army across the Pacific. But, in all those cases, we as a people rallied, took heart, and won the day — and, in the process, discovered new meanings in that old word, freedom.

Today we live in a society that is perhaps more free than any that has ever existed. Almost every one of us has the franchise now — an idea unimaginable to the men who signed that document in Philadelphia. We can go where we please with no internal passports, say what we wish without fear of persecution, worship as we will without needing anybody’s authorization to do so.

And yet, freedom is a fragile thing, and there is no enemy with more power to take our freedoms away than we have ourselves. We can vote our freedoms away, electing men who value office more than honor. We can sell our freedoms away, buying products and services from monopolists and multinationals who seek to strangle the small businesses that preserve competition and vitality in our economy. We can even idle our freedoms away, by doing nothing as those who would profit from our subjugation chip away at our right to speak, to assemble, to live as free men and women.

Today, as the fireworks die out, the parades march off into the distance, and the crowds go home, it’s important to remember what freedom really means, and the men and women who have suffered and died to allow us to gain that understanding. Freedom is a rare gift in a world where the lot of most people over the millenia has been slavery or servitude. Are you doing your part to make sure that it’s not a gift that we’ll be the last to enjoy?